Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×



Details

Submitted on
May 24, 2010
File Size
19.2 MB
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
2,679
Favourites
14 (who?)
Comments
6
Downloads
323
×
Old Paper Texture by singularitycomplex Old Paper Texture by singularitycomplex
Made by crumpling a piece of drawing paper, soaking it in a mixture of heavy tea and red wine vinegar for 20 minutes, and then baking at 450 degrees for 15 minutes. The downloaded zip file contains the edited 2500x3300 .png version of the file (top), as well an unedited 5000x6600 .jpg version of the file (bottom). The total file size of the download is 19.2mb, and the images it contains are vertically oriented.

I permit the use of this stock under the following conditions:

- it is not to be used in any commercial venue or towards any commercial gains. If you would like to use this stock in such a way (prints, commercial website banners, backgrounds, etc.) please contact me, we may be able to negotiate.
- you credit and link back to me if it is used in anything posted to dA, Elfwood, or any other art community website.
- you do not redistribute as stock or claim ownership/rights to it.

It would also be nice if you let me know if/when you use it and leave a link to the finished product.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconmargie22:
Margie22 Featured By Owner Oct 3, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I love this texture, thanks so much for making it! [link]
Reply
:iconkuromu:
Kuromu Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2011   Digital Artist
Thanks for this, it was perfect!

[link]
Reply
:iconsingularitycomplex:
singularitycomplex Featured By Owner Nov 20, 2011
Thanks for using it, and well at that.
Reply
:iconjaskij:
jaskij Featured By Owner May 25, 2010
Great stock Adam :)
For such stock try coffee, one of my friends also cooked such a thing in a frying pan.
Reply
:iconsingularitycomplex:
singularitycomplex Featured By Owner May 25, 2010
Really? With oil and everything? :p
Reply
:iconjaskij:
jaskij Featured By Owner May 25, 2010
AFAIR it was with oil, but I might be wrong on this one, cause it was quite a few years back.
Reply
Add a Comment: